firaga vs. flare - Printable Version +- Final Fantasy d20 Forums (https://forums.finalfantasyd20.com) +-- Forum: Final Fantasy d20 Forums (https://forums.finalfantasyd20.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Forum: FFd20 Information and Ruleset (https://forums.finalfantasyd20.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Thread: firaga vs. flare (/showthread.php?tid=166) |
firaga vs. flare - fel_horfrost - 08-02-2013 I could be wrong but firaga seems to be a superior spell to flare. It's a lvl lower does d8s instead of d6s has a 30ft. Range instead of the 20ft. Of flare. I know flare inflicts the burning status but is that worth being a spell level higher? I'd like my fellow players opinions maybe I'm missing something. Thanks for your time. RE: firaga vs. flare - Viladin - 08-02-2013 (08-02-2013, 03:44 AM)fel_horfrost Wrote: I could be wrong but firaga seems to be a superior spell to flare. I'll have to look into it and make some changes. RE: firaga vs. flare - Zeth - 08-15-2013 Burning is a gift that can keep on giving, but I agree but I do see places where costing a foe an action would be better. Most cases though the damage is a better choice. RE: firaga vs. flare - Cloudhand - 05-23-2014 (08-02-2013, 06:26 AM)Viladin Wrote:(08-02-2013, 03:44 AM)fel_horfrost Wrote: I could be wrong but firaga seems to be a superior spell to flare. Also, because of the way it is worded, Firaga also inflicts burning status. So Flare is strictly worse. RE: firaga vs. flare - fel_horfrost - 05-23-2014 Maybe if flare ignored spell resistance or fire resistances. Maybe add a few more negative status effects like dazed, blinded, or stunned. Or make it a bigger boom lol. I mean how cool would it be to kill a fire elemental with a fire spell. |